[Jandek] Pitchfork - what's the deal?
bad_dreams at elvis.com
Fri Jun 17 09:06:46 PDT 2005
sorry, but pitchfork deserves all the abuse and worse.
they open themselves to those kinds of comments by being whores to major labels, reviewing,
publicizing and even recommending the trash put out by corporate labels, who regularly fuck artists and
the public over with in-house publishing contracts, no benefits for employees, funding the RIAA, etc.
----- Original Message -----
From: SAMUEL_MATHESON at acdi-cida.gc.ca [mailto:SAMUEL_MATHESON at acdi-cida.gc.ca]
Sent: 6/17/2005 8:51:29 AM
To: jandek at mylist.net
Subject: [Jandek] Pitchfork - what's the deal?
> "I read Pitchfork a lot just because I don't really know of any decent
> music sites, but they disgust me more every day. Do you know of any
> music sites that actually deserve people's readership?"
> What's the big beef so many have with Pitchfork, anyway? I'm one of those
> nerds who checks PF every morning after going through the e-mail, and still
> find decent reviews that prompt me to lay down some $ from time to
> time...sure they grate sometimes and try to be a bit too hip/amusing, but
> every music review site I've ever seen falls foul of these traps sometimes.
> jandek mailing list
> jandek at mylist.net
More information about the jandek